Why Bigger Acquisitions Are Less Risky

The Risk Paradox of Business Acquisitions

While all acquisitions carry inherent risk, the factors that make larger deals safer might surprise you. Let's explore why banks, lenders, and investors often prefer financing a $5m acquisition over a $500m one, despite the seemingly higher stakes.

Why Bigger Targets Present Lower Risk

1. Operational Resilience

Businesses with $1m+ EBITDA typically have:

• Established management layers that don't depend entirely on the owner

• Documented systems and processes that survive personnel changes

• Redundancy in key positions preventing single points of failure

When a key employee leaves a smaller company, it often creates an immediate crisis. Larger operations can absorb these changes without dramatic disruption to daily operations.

2. Financial Stability & Predictability

• More predictable cash flows with lower month-to-month volatility

• Diversified revenue streams across multiple customers/products

• Established banking relationships with access to working capital

• Professional financial management with proper controls and reporting

One client's experience illustrates this perfectly: After acquiring three companies with sub-$600k EBITDA and facing constant cash flow crises, they shifted to acquiring a $2.5m EBITDA business.

The difference? The larger acquisition had a full-time financial controller, properly managed AR/AP cycles, and produced reliable monthly financials that enabled proactive decision-making.

3. Customer Diversity & Market Position

Larger operations typically benefit from:

• Reduced customer concentration risk (rarely more than 5% of revenue from any single client)

• Stronger competitive positioning with established market share

• Higher barriers to entry protecting their market position

• More formalized customer relationships with contracts and renewals

A small acquisition with 40% of revenue coming from one customer represents an enormous risk. Larger businesses have typically outgrown this vulnerability.

4. Enhanced Due Diligence Capabilities

• Better financial records enable more thorough investigation

• Professional advisors involved throughout the process

• Formal contracts and agreements provide clearer picture of obligations

• Longer operating history with traceable performance patterns

The quality of information available during due diligence dramatically improves with company size, reducing the chances of post-closing surprises.

5. Superior Talent Retention

• Market-competitive compensation structures already in place

• Career advancement opportunities for key employees

• Less dependence on owner relationships for client retention

• More formalized culture and environment that transcends individuals

When acquiring a smaller business, key employees often leave if the owner exits. Larger operations have typically developed loyalty to the organization rather than just its founder.

6. Transaction Structure Advantages

• More financing options available at better terms

• Seller financing more common and substantial

• Longer transition periods with former owners

• More sophisticated legal protections including representations and warranties

Banks and other lenders compete aggressively for larger deals with established cash flows, often offering terms unavailable to smaller transactions. Private credit, SBICs and other non-bank lending options become viable for companies with $2m+ EBITDA.

The Hidden Dangers of "Starting Small"

The seemingly prudent approach of "testing the acquisition waters" with smaller deals often backfires. Smaller acquisitions typically:

• Demand disproportionate management attention relative to their impact

• Lack the systems and processes needed for smooth integration

• Have more undocumented tribal knowledge walking out with the seller

• Present surprises not discoverable during limited due diligence

• Offer fewer financing options, creating cash flow pressure from day one

The Economics of Scale in Acquisition

The transaction costs of an $8m acquisition might be only 20-30% higher than those for a $800k deal, despite representing 10x the economic value. This creates dramatically better economics:

• Legal costs spread across larger economic value

• Due diligence expenses yield better protection per dollar

• Integration resources create more significant returns

• Management time invested affects larger revenue and profit base

When Should You Consider Smaller Acquisitions?

Smaller acquisitions make sense primarily when:

• They represent strategic technology or capability acquisitions

• You have significant experience in the specific industry

• The target can be fully integrated into your existing operations

• You have excess management capacity to handle integration challenges

The Bottom Line: Think Bigger for Lower Risk

If building through acquisition is your growth strategy, counter your natural instinct to start small. The data consistently shows that properly structured larger acquisitions:

• Present lower operational and financial risk

• Offer better financing options

• Provide more robust due diligence opportunities

• Create superior returns relative to effort invested

As one experienced lender put it: "I'd rather finance ten $3m acquisitions than thirty $1m deals. The success rate is dramatically higher, and the surprises are dramatically fewer."

Your next growth move might be bigger, and safer, than you initially thought.

Tell a Friend

If you received this newsletter from a friend, don't miss out on future insights. Subscribe now at thefinancingflow.net to receive weekly issues directly to your inbox.

To your financing success!