- The Financing Flow
- Posts
- First-Out Financing Decoded
First-Out Financing Decoded
Using priority waterfalls to unlock financing options
Picture this: A private equity firm just closed a $30 million lower middle market acquisition using a financing structure where one lender gets paid before everyone else, even other "senior" lenders.
Welcome to first-out financing, where traditional lending hierarchies get flipped to create win-wins for banks, non-bank lenders, and deal sponsors.
If you're involved in acquisition financing, understanding first-out structures isn't optional anymore. These arrangements have quietly become one of the most powerful tools in modern deal-making.

What is First-Out Financing?
First-out financing creates a payment priority system within what looks like a single debt facility.
Here's the key difference:
Traditional structure: Senior lender vs. subordinated lender (separate agreements)
First-out structure: Multiple lenders in one facility with different payment priorities
Think of it as a waterfall within a waterfall. Cash flows hit the facility, then get distributed according to predetermined priorities.
Why it emerged:
Banks wanted lower-risk positions for regulatory requirements
Non-bank lenders sought higher yields
Traditional lending categories became too rigid
The beauty? Flexibility. Rather than forcing lenders into rigid senior/subordinated boxes, first-out structures let deal teams craft custom payment waterfalls.

The Anatomy of a First-Out Structure
Typical sizing:
• First-out tranche: 60-70% of total debt package
• Last-out tranche: 30-40% of total debt package
Pricing differentials:
• First-out: SOFR + 400 bps
• Last-out: SOFR + 650-800 bps
• Spread: Usually 200-400 basis points difference
Security provisions:
• Both tranches share same collateral package
• First-out lender gets priority in liquidation
• First-out receives priority on subsidiary guarantees
The complexity factor: Unlike separate facilities, first-out arrangements need detailed provisions governing:
Cash flow distribution
Voting rights
Amendment procedures
Integration with mezzanine debt and equity

Real-World Example: MidState Manufacturing Acquisition
The Deal: Regional industrial components producer, $25M annual revenue, $35M purchase price
Capital Structure:
• $15M first-out tranche
• $10M last-out tranche
• $5M rollover equity
• $5M sponsor equity
The Players:
Regional Bank: $15M first-out at SOFR + 425 bps
Mezzanine Lender: $10M last-out at SOFR + 775 bps
PE Sponsor: Buyer providing $5M equity
How payments flow:
Monthly cash sweeps service first-out principal and interest first
Then last-out interest payments
Excess cash pays down first-out principal until retired
All remaining payments flow to last-out lender
The result: Regional Bank got full repayment in 18 months. Mezz lender continued earning attractive yields. PE buyer achieved 100 bps cost savings vs. separate facilities.

Why Everyone Wins
Banks love first-out because:
• Enhanced security reduces risk-weighted assets
• Better capital ratios
• Compete with non-banks while staying conservative
Non-bank lenders get:
• Higher yields than traditional senior debt
• Better security than typical subordinated financing
• Bank does underwriting and monitoring
Private equity firms enjoy:
• Higher total leverage than bank-only financing
• Lower blended cost of capital
• Execution certainty with committed facilities
Target companies benefit from:
• Larger debt packages
• Higher purchase prices possible
• Simplified lender relationships

The Downsides
Increased complexity:
• Documentation costs run 25-40% higher
• Sophisticated intercreditor agreements required
• More administrative burden
Workout challenges:
• First-out and last-out lenders may have conflicting interests
• Enforcement can be difficult when interests diverge
Ongoing operational costs:
• Managing cash flow waterfalls
• Separate reporting requirements
• Coordinating amendments across parties

Market Trends
First-out financing continues gaining traction as:
• Regulatory pressures drive banks toward capital-efficient structures
• Competition among lenders creates pricing innovation
• Middle market companies demand more flexible capital solutions
Coming innovations:
Multiple first-out tranches
Hybrid first-out/mezzanine structures
Integration with alternative lending sources

Key Takeaways for Buyers
Should you consider first-out financing for your next acquisition?
It makes sense when:
• You need higher leverage than traditional bank financing allows
• You want execution certainty with committed lenders
• Deal size is $15M+ where complexity costs are justified
• You have a sophisticated finance team to manage ongoing requirements
Skip it when:
• Simple bank financing meets your needs
• Deal size is too small to justify added costs
• Your finance team lacks bandwidth for complex structures
• Target company has limited cash flow predictability
The bottom line: First-out financing isn't just a trendy structure – it's becoming a competitive necessity in today's acquisition market. Firms using these tools can access larger debt packages at lower costs, while those stuck with traditional financing may find themselves outbid.
Three questions to ask your lender:
Can first-out pricing beat separate senior/sub facilities?
What's the all-in execution timeline and cost?
How do workout provisions protect our interests?
Smart buyers are already incorporating first-out options into their financing playbook. The question isn't whether this structure will become mainstream, it's whether you'll master it before your competition does.

Tell a Friend
If you received this newsletter from a friend, don't miss out on future insights. Subscribe now at thefinancingflow.net to receive weekly issues directly to your inbox.
To your financing success!
